We don’t want “the current big tech companies to stifle new competition or abuse consumers. But in pushing back against the existing firms, we don’t want regulators to set rules that could close off new competitors, either.” -Economist @TimothyTTaylor https://t.co/UfTRl8LVTi
“On the internet, there are lots of other players,” highlights @mmasnick of @techdirt. Read more about the competition that leading tech services face in the digital age: https://t.co/llQUiziwdz
An Oakland-based journalism venture will launch next spring using funding from the @Google News Initiative – an example of the commitment of leading tech services to supporting journalism and local news, via @axios https://t.co/Z6iyK1B7fM
#DidYouKnow: “National market concentration in the US has indeed increased across many sectors, but concentration at the local level — where companies actually compete — has declined.” –@MrRBourne & @DiegoZuluagaL https://t.co/hbX5Hp0Hjr
#STRS: Neo-Brandeisian antitrust “assumes that a company’s size determines its performance,” argues @drj_policy. In reality, “the superior products and services attracted customers, which made each company big.” https://t.co/9EQ0zQnwhf
Neo-Brandeisian antitrust is based upon flawed logic, putting “emotion-based conclusions in front of facts and analysis.” Read more from @drj_policy in @AEI: https://t.co/9EQ0zQF78N
.@MichaelMandel of @ppi calculates that “for every $3 that an advertiser spends on digital advertising, they would have to spend $5 on print advertising to get the same impact. In the economic sense, digital advertising is more productive.” https://t.co/QYeFgxcfkh
Consumers are “enjoying more choice” through the activity of superstar companies. Though these companies enjoy higher mark-ups, “what is needed to erode their mark-ups is not more antitrust, but time — for such technologies to be broadly adopted,” via @ft https://t.co/hbX5Hp0Hjr
“Technological change can drive sudden shifts in jobs, and create emerging new occupations. For example, the rise of ecommerce fulfillment centers means that the number of workers [in the industry] grew much faster than expected.” –@MichaelMandel of @ppi https://t.co/TpMZgz0kmr
#ICYMI: A plurality of Americans identify tech as the industry that will have the biggest positive impact on their lives in the next ten years. Read more: https://t.co/nnWlPjnWwQ https://t.co/fpNcBfUKLH
We don’t want “the current big tech companies to stifle new competition or abuse consumers. But in pushing back against the existing firms, we don’t want regulators to set rules that could close off new competitors, either.” -Economist @TimothyTTaylor https://t.co/UfTRl8LVTi
“On the internet, there are lots of other players,” highlights @mmasnick of @techdirt. Read more about the competition that leading tech services face in the digital age: https://t.co/llQUiziwdz
An Oakland-based journalism venture will launch next spring using funding from the @Google News Initiative – an example of the commitment of leading tech services to supporting journalism and local news, via @axios https://t.co/Z6iyK1B7fM
#DidYouKnow: “National market concentration in the US has indeed increased across many sectors, but concentration at the local level — where companies actually compete — has declined.” –@MrRBourne & @DiegoZuluagaL https://t.co/hbX5Hp0Hjr
#STRS: Neo-Brandeisian antitrust “assumes that a company’s size determines its performance,” argues @drj_policy. In reality, “the superior products and services attracted customers, which made each company big.” https://t.co/9EQ0zQnwhf
Neo-Brandeisian antitrust is based upon flawed logic, putting “emotion-based conclusions in front of facts and analysis.” Read more from @drj_policy in @AEI: https://t.co/9EQ0zQF78N
.@MichaelMandel of @ppi calculates that “for every $3 that an advertiser spends on digital advertising, they would have to spend $5 on print advertising to get the same impact. In the economic sense, digital advertising is more productive.” https://t.co/QYeFgxcfkh
Consumers are “enjoying more choice” through the activity of superstar companies. Though these companies enjoy higher mark-ups, “what is needed to erode their mark-ups is not more antitrust, but time — for such technologies to be broadly adopted,” via @ft https://t.co/hbX5Hp0Hjr
“Technological change can drive sudden shifts in jobs, and create emerging new occupations. For example, the rise of ecommerce fulfillment centers means that the number of workers [in the industry] grew much faster than expected.” –@MichaelMandel of @ppi https://t.co/TpMZgz0kmr
#ICYMI: A plurality of Americans identify tech as the industry that will have the biggest positive impact on their lives in the next ten years. Read more: https://t.co/nnWlPjnWwQ https://t.co/fpNcBfUKLH